Document in text mode:

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of CERTAIN CARBON AND ALLOY STEEL PRODUCTS Inv. No. 337-TA-1002 COMMISSION OPINION On November 14, 2016, the presiding Administrative Law Judge ("AU") in the above-identified investigation issued Order No. 38, an initial determination ("ID") granting Respondents' motion to terminate Complainant's antitrust claim under 19 C.F.R. § 210.21 and, in the alternative, under 19 C.F.R. § 210.18. The Commission has determined to affirm in part, as modified by our reasoning below, and reverse in part the ID (Order No. 38). Specifically, the Commission has determined that antitrust injury standing is required for antitrust claims before the Commission. Complainant does not argue that it meets this requirement and, to the contrary, represents on review that it will not amend the complaint to plead or prove antitrust injury as Complainant contends that it is unable to prove antitrust injury. Accordingly, for the reasons disc...